Merge lp:~xnox/britney/oem-osp1 into lp:~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu
Proposed by
Dimitri John Ledkov
Status: | Rejected | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rejected by: | Steve Langasek | ||||
Proposed branch: | lp:~xnox/britney/oem-osp1 | ||||
Merge into: | lp:~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu | ||||
Diff against target: |
10 lines (+1/-0) 1 file modified
ubuntu-release (+1/-0) |
||||
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~xnox/britney/oem-osp1 | ||||
Related bugs: |
|
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Steve Langasek | Disapprove | ||
Andy Whitcroft | Pending | ||
Ubuntu Release Team | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+371570@code.launchpad.net |
To post a comment you must log in.
Unmerged revisions
- 3813. By Dimitri John Ledkov
-
Add osp1 variant to the oem hint.
Does the original rationale for badtesting all of the custom kernels still apply? Looking at http:// autopkgtest. ubuntu. com/packages/ l/linux- oem-osp1/ eoan/amd64 I see a successful rebuild test against glibc; a number of 'neutral' test results for testing the actual kernel (as expected since the autopkgtest instances won't actually boot any kernel except generic); and then a number of legitimate rebuild test failures due to the fact that this kernel still needs updated to 5.2 in order to fix the compatibility problem with the current eoan toolchain.
So why is an 'all' hint in order if the current failure is transient and package- version- specific?