Merge lp:~xnox/apport/xenial-s390x into lp:apport
Proposed by
Dimitri John Ledkov
on 2016-09-05
| Status: | Needs review |
|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | lp:~xnox/apport/xenial-s390x |
| Merge into: | lp:apport |
| Diff against target: |
137 lines (+23/-14) 2 files modified
test/test_backend_apt_dpkg.py (+21/-13) test/test_ui.py (+2/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~xnox/apport/xenial-s390x |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Pitt | 2016-09-05 | Needs Fixing on 2016-09-05 | |
| Brian Murray | 2016-09-05 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
To post a comment you must log in.
| Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote : | # |
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | # |
Thanks for looking into this! This still needs some fixes as you already said, but the general direction is fine.
review:
Needs Fixing
Unmerged revisions
- 3103. By Dimitri John Ledkov on 2016-09-05
-
Start moving tests to xenial, add basic s390x support.


s390x is only available on xenial and up.
I've started to upgrade the test-suite to xenial and add basic s390x compatibility.
There are a few tests that use package names and version numbers that are only available on some architectures -> these are skipped for now, ideally a new set of test packages and version numbers should be picked for the tests that include binaries on all autopkgtestable architectures (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x) and still have the right properties/version orderings.
I had to move the test-suite to xenial series, but i'm not so sure that I did it all correctly.