Merge lp:~vorlon/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-release-esm into lp:ubuntu-archive-tools
Proposed by
Steve Langasek
on 2017-05-16
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Merged at revision: | 1100 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~vorlon/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-release-esm |
| Merge into: | lp:ubuntu-archive-tools |
| Diff against target: |
85 lines (+35/-9) 1 file modified
sru-release (+35/-9) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~vorlon/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-release-esm |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Conrad | 2017-05-16 | Approve on 2017-05-16 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
To post a comment you must log in.
lp:~vorlon/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-release-esm
updated
on 2017-05-16
- 1101. By Steve Langasek on 2017-05-16
-
Add an esm option to avoid hard-coding precise in the code, per Adam's feedback
| Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : | # |
> If this isn't yet tested, I'd recommend twiddling archive names and doing some
> test runs to verify it works how you think it does, but +1 from me.
I verified sane output with --no-act for the ESM case, and verified that the script still works for the non-ESM case, so I consider that tested.

LGTM. As mentioned on IRC, maybe we could clean up the UI a bit to actually differentiate between primary pockets and ESM PPAs when displaying source and target versions, but UI isn't ubuntu- archive- tools' strong suit.
If this isn't yet tested, I'd recommend twiddling archive names and doing some test runs to verify it works how you think it does, but +1 from me.