> Maybe it isn't that bad to update test cases with new digests. I just
> wondering why that method of digest calculation has been chosen. Probably
> nobody should refer to digests in their scripts/applications/etc, and they are
> needed only for internal purposes.
It can lead to issues during merging. If several people make MP with updated tests merge captain should update that test results manually. But I think we can do nothing with it. We can't make rules for test scripts as we work with upstream code.
> Maybe it isn't that bad to update test cases with new digests. I just applications/ etc, and they are
> wondering why that method of digest calculation has been chosen. Probably
> nobody should refer to digests in their scripts/
> needed only for internal purposes.
It can lead to issues during merging. If several people make MP with updated tests merge captain should update that test results manually. But I think we can do nothing with it. We can't make rules for test scripts as we work with upstream code.