> Makes sense, which packages did you try running this with?
libpng
This package requires that *some* test deps are compiled but not the package library itself.
> Would feel more
> comfortable knowing it was tried with some package that normally has to be
> compiled, but doesn't request it in the restrictions to see
'has to be compiled'is a configuration that should not exist. It would mean the package is not testing the installed version which is what dep-8 tests are about.
> that 1. it doesn't
> compile it, and 2. the tests still pass since the binary package is installed.
But *that* is what I tested, test passing despite not compiling the package.
> Makes sense, which packages did you try running this with?
libpng
This package requires that *some* test deps are compiled but not the package library itself.
> Would feel more
> comfortable knowing it was tried with some package that normally has to be
> compiled, but doesn't request it in the restrictions to see
'has to be compiled'is a configuration that should not exist. It would mean the package is not testing the installed version which is what dep-8 tests are about.
> that 1. it doesn't
> compile it, and 2. the tests still pass since the binary package is installed.
But *that* is what I tested, test passing despite not compiling the package.
> Otherwise, +1