Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/always-double-buffers

  1. always-double-buffers
  2. Merge into development-branch
Revision history for this message
Kevin DuBois (kdub) wrote :

> Also, bq/n10
> have a bit different fencing then the n4, a sanity check there might be
> worthwhile

Did a sanity check on bq, lgtm!

review: Approve

« Back to merge proposal