Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/compiz/fix-1037411

Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

I agree line 86 may be redundant, but I was covering for the case where you may not know which test within the fixture gets executed next. At least it's defensive against future maintenance.

I know EGL has the preservation option. There's a similar extension for GLX, but it was never fully implemented when I tried it last.

« Back to merge proposal