~ultimaker/ultimaker/+git/CuraEngine:3.3

Last commit made on 2018-04-12
Get this branch:
git clone -b 3.3 https://git.launchpad.net/~ultimaker/ultimaker/+git/CuraEngine

Branch merges

Branch information

Recent commits

2853c72... by Diego Prado Gesto <email address hidden>

Merge branch '3.3' of github.com:Ultimaker/CuraEngine into 3.3

2cdd761... by Diego Prado Gesto <email address hidden>

CURA-5222 Skip optimizing wall printing order in the first layer if the
adhesion type is brim.

f2e2699... by Ruben D

Get 1st inner wall offset from correct outline

We want it from the outer wall, just like how it's computed when not trying the alternative line width.

Contributes to issue CURA-5189.

bd3cb53... by Lipu Fei

Merge pull request #739 from Ultimaker/feature_try_line_widths

Try multiple line widths if that may produce a nicer continuous wall

54d2814... by Ruben D

Try multiple line widths if that may produce a nicer continuous wall

Walls may get fractured in some cases. This is supposed to fix it by also trying a 0.01mm slimmer wall.

Contributes to issue CURA-5189.

07a2f1c... by Mark Burton <email address hidden>

Revert removeEmptyFirstLayers() back to how it was before - it's wrong to use layer_height_0.

82dfc2e... by Mark Burton <email address hidden>

If the first layer is empty and the second is not empty, always remove the first layer.

The first layer can be empty when the slicing tolerance is not inclusive and support won't
be generated in such a small gap so move the model down.

This is done without consulting remove_empty_first_layers as that setting is hidden when
support is in use and so it could be true or not and the user would not know so I think
it's better to ignore it here.

7235c2d... by Mark Burton <email address hidden>

Now removeEmptyFirstLayers() is also passed the height of the first layer.

Before, it calculated that the height of the N removed layers was N * layer_height but now
it uses layer_height_0 + (N - 1) * layer_height.

6016e7c... by Lipu Fei

Put jenkins job timeout for each node

91bb356... by Ruben D

Merge branch 'oder_opt_mem_bug_fix'