lp:ubuntu/precise/python2.7

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Related source package recipes

1 recipe using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Bug #898172: ctypes broken on armhf

Unknown

New

Link a bug report

Related blueprints

57. By Steve Langasek on 2012-04-20

* python2.7-minimal needs a versioned depends on python-minimal, not a
  Conflicts. Conflicts with essential packages, versioned or otherwise,
  are a serious problem for upgrades, as the previous upload demonstrated.
  Instead, we allow a circular dependency between python2.7-minimal and
  python-minimal, and rely on the fact that the package manager ensures
  new versions of both packages will be unpacked before running the
  maintainer script from python2.7-minimal. LP: #986374.
* Our versioned dependency on python-minimal is 2.6.6-3+squeeze1, which is
  the first version shipping a pycompile that supports passing a -V option
  referring to a version python-minimal doesn't already know about.

56. By Matthias Klose on 2012-04-19

python2.7-minimal: Conflict with python-minimal (<< 2.7.3). LP: #983981.

55. By Matthias Klose on 2012-04-10

Python 2.7.3 release.

54. By Matthias Klose on 2012-04-06

Merge with Debian; remaining changes:

53. By Matthias Klose on 2012-03-21

* Loosen build dependency on expat (the version in precise has the
  security fixes applied).
* Add safety check to ensure that the _bsddb extension is built.

52. By Steve Langasek on 2012-03-09

Re-enable the db5.1 patch again. LP: #440889.

51. By Matthias Klose on 2012-03-09

* Merge with Debian; remaining changes:
  - Build-depend on libdb5.1-dev.

50. By Matthias Klose on 2012-02-16

* Update to 20120216, taken from the 2.7 branch.
* Install an egg-info file for arparse.

49. By Matthias Klose on 2012-01-21

Really apply the db5.1 patch. LP: #440889 (why is such an old and
unrelated issue number used?).

48. By Matthias Klose on 2012-01-21

Really apply the db5.1 patch. LP: #440889 (why is such an old and
unrelated issue number used?).