Merge lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/libosl/oneiric-201109020931 into lp:ubuntu/oneiric/libosl

Proposed by Ubuntu Package Importer
Status: Needs review
Proposed branch: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/libosl/oneiric-201109020931
Merge into: lp:ubuntu/oneiric/libosl
Diff against target: 33 lines (+22/-0) (has conflicts)
2 files modified
debian/patches/link-boost.patch (+21/-0)
debian/patches/series (+1/-0)
Conflict adding file debian/patches.  Moved existing file to debian/patches.moved.
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/libosl/oneiric-201109020931
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Ubuntu branches Pending
Review via email: mp+73912@code.launchpad.net

Description of the change

The package importer has detected a possible inconsistency between the package history in the archve and the history in bzr. As the archive is authoritative the importer has made lp:ubuntu/oneiric/libosl reflect what is in the archive and the old bzr branch has been pushed to lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/libosl/oneiric-201109020931. This merge proposal was created so that an Ubuntu developer can review the situations and perform a merge/upload if necessary. There are three typical cases where this can happen.
  1. Where someone pushes a change to bzr and someone else uploads the package without that change. This is the reason that this check is done by the importer. If this appears to be the case then a merge/upload should be done if the changes that were in bzr are still desirable.
  2. The importer incorrectly detected the above situation when someone made a change in bzr and then uploaded it.
  3. The importer incorrectly detected the above situation when someone just uploaded a package and didn't touch bzr.

If this case doesn't appear to be the first situation then set the status of the merge proposal to "Rejected" and help avoid the problem in future by filing a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd linking to this merge proposal.

(this is an automatically generated message)

To post a comment you must log in.

Unmerged revisions

6. By Barry Warsaw

* debian/rules: disable -Werror for -Wunused-but-set-variable
* debian/patches/link-boost.patch: link shared lib with boost (LP: #770752)

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
1=== added directory 'debian/patches'
2=== renamed directory 'debian/patches' => 'debian/patches.moved'
3=== added file 'debian/patches/link-boost.patch'
4--- debian/patches/link-boost.patch 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
5+++ debian/patches/link-boost.patch 2011-09-02 23:06:33 +0000
6@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
7+Description: link with needed boost libs
8+ the shared library uses boost and should link against it so the
9+ dependencies are picked up by dh_shlibdeps and to allow linking
10+ with ld --as-needed
11+Author: Julian Taylor <jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com>
12+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633470
13+Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpsshogi/+bug/770752
14+Index: libosl/release-so/Makefile
15+===================================================================
16+--- libosl.orig/release-so/Makefile 2011-08-29 17:30:18.174760804 +0200
17++++ libosl/release-so/Makefile 2011-08-29 17:30:32.494760913 +0200
18+@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
19+ ln -s ../$$o $$target; \
20+ fi; \
21+ done)
22+- $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -shared -Wl,-soname,libosl.so.1 -o $@ $(patsubst %,.objs/%,$(subst /,-,$^))
23++ $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -shared -Wl,-soname,libosl.so.1 -o $@ $(patsubst %,.objs/%,$(subst /,-,$^)) \
24++ -lboost_thread -lboost_serialization -lboost_iostreams -lboost_filesystem -lboost_system
25+ ln -sf $@ libosl.so.1
26+ ln -sf $@ libosl.so
27+
28
29=== added file 'debian/patches/series'
30--- debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
31+++ debian/patches/series 2011-09-02 23:06:33 +0000
32@@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
33+link-boost.patch

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches

to all changes: