lp:ubuntu/gutsy/flex

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Related blueprints

13. By LaMont Jones on 2007-10-04

Trigger rebuild for hppa

12. By Manoj on 2007-05-16

Bug fix: "flex: FTBFS if built twice in a row", thanks to Bernd
Zeimetz (Closes: #424274).

11. By Manoj on 2007-01-18

Bug fix: "flex: [INTL:es] Spanish po-debconf translation", thanks to
César Gómez Martín (Closes: #402235).

10. By Matthias Klose on 2007-03-05

Rebuild for changes in the amd64 toolchain.

9. By Manoj on 2006-10-23

Remove trailing ; from libfl.so script.

8. By Manoj on 2006-05-03

* Bug fix: "Spelling mistake in package description", thanks to Simon
  Waters. reenterant -> reentrant (Closes: #363415).
* Bug fix: "flex [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages",
  thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #362984).

7. By Adam Conrad on 2006-05-08

Merge with the older 2.5.31-38, rather than syncing a new upstream from
sid to avoid new upstream bugs, while fixing two important bugs in our
current package: a timestamp skew FTBFS and the leak in the C+scanner.

6. By Martin Pitt on 2006-03-02

debian/local.mk: Remove skel.c to force regeneration from flex.skl.

5. By Martin Pitt on 2006-03-01

* SECURITY UPDATE: Buffer overflow in generated C parsers which use REJECT
  or 'trailing context' rules.
* flex.skl: Fix allocation of yy_state_buf to provide enough space for the
  longest possible token (forgotten sizeof multiplication).
* References:
  CVE-2006-0459
  Malone #30940

4. By Manoj on 2005-10-23

* Bug fix: "flex: doxygen warning: argument `str' of command @param is
  not found in the argumentlist", thanks to Ludovic Rousseau
                                                         (Closes: #320134).
* Bug fix: "flex generates a C file with improper macro defn; broke
  Bison 2.1", thanks to Paul Eggert. Well, even though it is legal C99
  to have empty arguments in macros (so it is legal to call a macro
  taking one argument with no arguments), it was not legal C89 --
  therefore, emit tqo different macros, with and without arguments -- to
  cater to users running obsolete compilers. (Closes: #333231).