@pitti, it would be great if, when you upload to Ubuntu, you also
proposal a merge against lp:ecryptfs, so that we don't lose track of
it. I try to stay on top of non-maintainer uploads, and pull those
back upstream, but occasionally these get missed. Thanks!
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Tyler Hicks <email address hidden> wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews.
>
> @Jason I fixed up a couple of the shellcheck warnings before merging.
>
> @Martin Yes, it looks like your postinst snippet for vivid was lost. The way that new upstream eCryptfs releases are cut and uploaded to Ubuntu makes this a possibility for any packaging changes that are not upstreamed to lp:ecryptfs. :/
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~tyhicks/ecryptfs/lp1597154-packaging/+merge/299605
> Your team eCryptfs is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~tyhicks/ecryptfs/lp1597154-packaging into lp:ecryptfs.
@pitti, it would be great if, when you upload to Ubuntu, you also
proposal a merge against lp:ecryptfs, so that we don't lose track of
it. I try to stay on top of non-maintainer uploads, and pull those
back upstream, but occasionally these get missed. Thanks!
Dustin Kirkland
Ubuntu Product & Strategy
Canonical, Ltd.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Tyler Hicks <email address hidden> wrote: /code.launchpad .net/~tyhicks/ ecryptfs/ lp1597154- packaging/ +merge/ 299605
> Thanks for the reviews.
>
> @Jason I fixed up a couple of the shellcheck warnings before merging.
>
> @Martin Yes, it looks like your postinst snippet for vivid was lost. The way that new upstream eCryptfs releases are cut and uploaded to Ubuntu makes this a possibility for any packaging changes that are not upstreamed to lp:ecryptfs. :/
> --
> https:/
> Your team eCryptfs is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~tyhicks/ecryptfs/lp1597154-packaging into lp:ecryptfs.