Code review comment for lp:~tr3buchet/nova/multi_nic

Revision history for this message
Tushar Patil (tpatil) wrote :

> Now I see only 2 exceptions, one in the release_fixed_ip method and another in
> the lease_fixed_ip method. In both the cases the virtual interface is referred
> which is already deleted in the deallocated_for_instance method.

You have completely eliminated checking of mac address from both these methods so now there is no question of getting these exceptions. But IMO, mac address checking is very important without which it is possible to release fixed ip which is associated with another instance.
But having said that, I don't see there is any problem here because until this fixed ip address is not disassociated it cannot be assigned to another instance.

To keep mac address checking intact, you can have to set delete status to True in the virtual_interfaces db table instead of deleting the virtual interfaces records of that instance.

Apart from that, during testing rev 854 I am getting following errors:-

1) While upgrading database using nova-manage db sync command , I get following error:-

OperationalError: (OperationalError) (1005, "Can't create table 'nova.#sql-51a_f3a' (errno: 121)") 'ALTER TABLE fixed_ips ADD CONSTRAINT fixed_ips_virtual_interfaces_fkey FOREIGN KEY(virtual_interface_id) REFERENCES virtual_interfaces (id)' ()

I am using Mysql 5.1.49.

You can check for the error messages here at http://paste.openstack.org/show/1763/

2) If I ignore error #1 above, then at the time of spinning a new VM instance I see another error in the nova-compute.log

ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError) (1146, "Table 'nova.provider_fw_rules' doesn't exist") 'SELECT provider_fw_rules.created_at AS provider_fw_rules_created_at, provider_fw_rules.updated_at AS provider_fw_rules_updated_at, provider_fw_rules.deleted_at AS provider_fw_rules_deleted_at, provider_fw_rules.deleted AS provider_fw_rules_deleted, provider_fw_rules.id AS provider_fw_rules_id, provider_fw_rules.protocol AS provider_fw_rules_protocol, provider_fw_rules.from_port AS provider_fw_rules_from_port, provider_fw_rules.to_port AS provider_fw_rules_to_port, provider_fw_rules.cidr AS provider_fw_rules_cidr \nFROM provider_fw_rules \nWHERE provider_fw_rules.deleted = %s' (False,)

You can check for the detailed error messages here at http://paste.openstack.org/show/1762/

I think this problem is not relevant to you since "provider_fw_rules" db table is not added in the trunk.

review: Needs Fixing

« Back to merge proposal