Code review comment for lp:~thumper/nux/properties

Revision history for this message
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen (kamstrup) wrote :

On 12 July 2011 11:16, Tim Penhey <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:07:40 you wrote:
>> Ok, I know I am beating a dead horse here; you two agree so I am good
>> with that :-)
>> Nonetheless, I don't think my point has come across: My worry is that
>> this is a purely dynamical property system and that it is exactly
>> *unlike* member variables in that they are not related to (let alone
>> defined in) the class.
> Ah... I think this is where we disagree.  It isn't a dynamical property
> system.
>> So two instances a1 and a2 of class A could
>> easily have totally different sets of properties.
> No they couldn't.

Hehe... and my mediocre C++ skills are revealed - Move along, nothing
to see here :-)

« Back to merge proposal