Code review comment for lp:~thumper/nux/properties
Revision history for this message
| Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote | # |
© 2004-2023
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
33dc2e2
(Get the code!)
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:46:29 you wrote:
> Good point. Conceptually I'd say that one needs a private or protected
> setter function that does this (which must be used by the consumers
> just like a public setter would), but if I understand correctly
> ROProps don't have setters in this setup?
Exactly. Given that the property is a member itself, you can't have a
protected setter that is accessible by the containing class.