Code review comment for lp:~thumper/nux/properties

Revision history for this message
Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote :

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:31:21 you wrote:
> Had a quick skim - nice work Tim :-) I have two points I want to raise:
> a) If I understand correct the default behaviour for a ROProperty is to
> not signal on change. I think this is this is the wrong behaviour for two
> reasons: 1) From my experience RO properties are used for things like a
> bool "connected" or "mapped" where they reflect unchangeable aspects of
> the underlying system. Normally you'll want change notifications on those.

My only real issue with ROProperty is that we don't know if it has changed or
not. So how do we know to signal?

« Back to merge proposal