Merge lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed into lp:tapaal
Proposed by
Lena Said
on 2020-09-14
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Jiri Srba on 2020-10-30 |
Approved revision: | 1107 |
Merged at revision: | 1110 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed |
Merge into: | lp:tapaal |
Diff against target: |
222 lines (+39/-23) 3 files modified
src/dk/aau/cs/gui/TabContent.java (+4/-0) src/dk/aau/cs/verification/VerifyTAPN/VerifyTAPNDiscreteVerification.java (+15/-5) src/pipe/gui/widgets/QueryDialog.java (+20/-18) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Jiri Srba | Approve on 2020-10-30 | ||
Kenneth Yrke Jørgensen | 2020-09-14 | Approve on 2020-10-30 | |
Lena Said (community) | Needs Resubmitting on 2020-09-26 | ||
Review via email:
|
Commit message
Added the discrete engine to untimed, gamed nets
To post a comment you must log in.
Jiri Srba (srba) wrote : | # |
I create a simple net for untimed and game lens, ask a simple AF query and the verification ends with error in query parsing. When I save the file and open again, the GUI hals and becomes unresponsive.
review:
Needs Fixing
lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed
updated
on 2020-09-20
Lena Said (lsaid) wrote : | # |
Fixed some logic that created bugs in the querydialog
review:
Needs Resubmitting
Jiri Srba (srba) wrote : | # |
In order to make this work, before the untimed game net is sent to verifydtapn engine
there should be added new isolated place, with one token in it and age invariant <=0.
Then the timed engine will be able to mimick the untimed game semantics.
review:
Needs Fixing
lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed
updated
on 2020-09-26
review:
Needs Resubmitting
lp:~tapaal-contributor/tapaal/add-discrete-to-untimed
updated
on 2020-09-27
- 1107. By lsaid <email address hidden> on 2020-09-27
-
Added token to the ghost place
review:
Approve
review:
Approve
Please check comments for one possible minior issue, just double check that the logic is as intended