Merge lp:~stub/launchpad/page-performance-report into lp:launchpad
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Stuart Bishop on 2010-05-27 |
| Approved revision: | no longer in the source branch. |
| Merge reported by: | Stuart Bishop |
| Merged at revision: | not available |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~stub/launchpad/page-performance-report |
| Merge into: | lp:launchpad |
| Diff against target: |
140 lines (+50/-14) 2 files modified
lib/canonical/launchpad/webapp/publication.py (+20/-6) lib/lp/scripts/utilities/pageperformancereport.py (+30/-8) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~stub/launchpad/page-performance-report |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Hovey (community) | release-critical | 2010-05-28 | Approve on 2010-05-29 |
| Stuart Bishop | Abstain on 2010-05-28 | ||
| Jeroen T. Vermeulen (community) | code | 2010-05-26 | Approve on 2010-05-27 |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Emit the pageid to the ZServer tracelogs.
Description of the Change
Emit the pageid to the ZServer tracelogs.
We will use this to improve our page performance reports. The report itself will not land this cycle, but it would be good to get the information into the production logs so we have real data to test the improved report against.
| Jeroen T. Vermeulen (jtv) wrote : | # |
| Jeroen T. Vermeulen (jtv) wrote : | # |
Since this is ongoing work, not operational yet, and some parts of it need to be landed I'm okay with landing this as a whole. The two conditions are that (1) you ensure that things that used to work don't suddenly blow up, and (2) there be a bug about the missing tests.
| Stuart Bishop (stub) wrote : | # |
This should have landed a few hours before PQM closed, but ec2 silently ate the branch (twice!)
| Curtis Hovey (sinzui) wrote : | # |
I am sorry that I missed your original request. You have my RC to land this.

Fixed some things interactively: removed a redundant comment, extracted a function so as to keep the surrounding if/elif block clear. Thanks for those, and the drive-by HTML cleanup.
Next thing to do for this is a bit of testing.