Merge lp:~stolowski/unity-scope-click/edit-reviews-15-04 into lp:unity-scope-click/touch-15-04
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Alejandro J. Cura on 2015-05-15 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 321 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 319 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~stolowski/unity-scope-click/edit-reviews-15-04 | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity-scope-click/touch-15-04 | ||||
| Diff against target: |
455 lines (+261/-20) 8 files modified
CMakeLists.txt (+1/-1) debian/control (+1/-1) libclickscope/click/preview.cpp (+82/-15) libclickscope/click/preview.h (+1/-0) libclickscope/click/reviews.cpp (+52/-0) libclickscope/click/reviews.h (+5/-2) libclickscope/tests/test_reviews.cpp (+117/-0) scope/clickapps/apps-scope.cpp (+2/-1) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~stolowski/unity-scope-click/edit-reviews-15-04 | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | 2015-05-12 | Needs Fixing on 2015-05-18 |
| Alejandro J. Cura (community) | 2015-05-12 | Approve on 2015-05-15 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2015-05-11.
Commit Message
Support for review editing.
Description of the Change
Support for review editing. Changed ReviewList type definition to use std::list instead of vector for better efficiency when moving own review to the front of the list.
| Alejandro J. Cura (alecu) wrote : | # |
Branch looks very good, just tried it on nexus 4 with devel-proposed.
One style comment: the method named "sort" is not really sorting the reviews, so it should be called "bring_to_front" or something similar.
Please also add a few unit tests for it.
- 321. By Paweł Stołowski on 2015-05-15
-
Renamed sort to bring_to_front and added unit tests for it
| Paweł Stołowski (stolowski) wrote : | # |
> Branch looks very good, just tried it on nexus 4 with devel-proposed.
>
> One style comment: the method named "sort" is not really sorting the reviews,
> so it should be called "bring_to_front" or something similar.
> Please also add a few unit tests for it.
Ok, renamed and added unit test for it.
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:321
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:321
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
None: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:321
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:321
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:320 jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-scope- click-ci/ 592/ jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-scope- click-wily- amd64-ci/ 4/console jenkins. qa.ubuntu. com/job/ unity-scope- click-wily- armhf-ci/ 4/console
http://
Executed test runs:
FAILURE: http://
FAILURE: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild: s-jenkins. ubuntu- ci:8080/ job/unity- scope-click- ci/592/ rebuild
http://