Code review comment for lp:~songofacandy/bzr/i18n-utextwrap

John C Barstow (jbowtie) wrote :

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Martin [gz] <email address hidden> wrote:
> We currently have en, es, ja, and ru docs so there isn't any need to deal with esoteric rules for other languages yet.

In general i18n terms, the only thing really missing to round out our
sample is a bidirectional language like Arabic (ar), which would
expose any major weaknesses left in the logic. But I'm more than happy
to see this land.

« Back to merge proposal