Merge lp:~sil2100/ubuntu-cdimage/appliance-images-take-one into lp:ubuntu-cdimage
Proposed by
Łukasz Zemczak
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 1885 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~sil2100/ubuntu-cdimage/appliance-images-take-one |
Merge into: | lp:ubuntu-cdimage |
Diff against target: |
272 lines (+97/-10) 11 files modified
bin/rebuild-requests (+2/-1) etc/default-arches (+1/-0) etc/livefs-launchpad (+1/-0) etc/purge-count (+2/-1) etc/purge-days (+1/-0) lib/cdimage/build.py (+3/-2) lib/cdimage/livefs.py (+3/-2) lib/cdimage/project.py (+1/-0) lib/cdimage/tests/test_build.py (+34/-0) lib/cdimage/tests/test_tree.py (+30/-0) lib/cdimage/tree.py (+19/-4) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~sil2100/ubuntu-cdimage/appliance-images-take-one |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Steve Langasek | Pending | ||
Ubuntu CD Image Team | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+386304@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
Propose a new ubuntu-appliance project for building the ubuntu-core appliance images.
Description of the change
I see at least three options to do this:
1) Simply adding all the appliance images to the ubuntu-core project as-is.
2) Adding a new project called ubuntu-appliances and building those there, same way as ubuntu-core.
3) Declaring a new 'virtual' "appliances" channel and building them as ubuntu-core but only on that channel-set.
I can discuss more about all the possibilities, but basically this approach follows the 2) option (I have experimented some with 3 too). Of course, we still need some livecd-rootfs changes, but that's a different discussion.
What do you think?
To post a comment you must log in.
Got a +1 on merging this from Steve without a full review - we can always revert, if needed.