Merge lp:~sergiusens/snappy/storeSnapType into lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | John Lenton on 2015-05-07 |
| Approved revision: | 444 |
| Merged at revision: | 444 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~sergiusens/snappy/storeSnapType |
| Merge into: | lp:~snappy-dev/snappy/snappy-moved-to-github |
| Diff against target: |
110 lines (+57/-3) 3 files modified
snappy/parts.go (+24/-0) snappy/snapp.go (+2/-3) snappy/snapp_test.go (+31/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~sergiusens/snappy/storeSnapType |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Vogt | 2015-05-06 | Approve on 2015-05-07 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Setup proper SnapType's from the store
| Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens) wrote : | # |
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:03:36AM -0000, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Review: Approve
>
> Thanks! Code looks fine, I wonder if the store could send us "app" instead of application but I guess thats problematic for click(?).
I argued for app in the original bug feature request and was told no,
reason for this to exist :-/
| Michael Vogt (mvo) wrote : | # |
What is the original bugreport? If there is no reason for app vs application I think we should ask again for app to avoid client side mangling.
| Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens) wrote : | # |
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:13:12AM -0000, Michael Vogt wrote:
> What is the original bugreport? If there is no reason for app vs application I think we should ask again for app to avoid client side mangling.
In any case we need to add support for 'os', 'gadget' and 'kernel'
We also need an API name cleanup (for consistency between the store and
snappy) and I already requested Ursula, whom is gathering requirements
for the store now, to take a look at adding that story.


Thanks! Code looks fine, I wonder if the store could send us "app" instead of application but I guess thats problematic for click(?).