Code review comment for lp:~sergei.glushchenko/percona-xtrabackup/2.1-xb-bug1347698

Alexey Kopytov (akopytov) wrote :


Looks good except "Ingnoed" and irrelevant comment about --parallel in the test case.

Also, thanks for fixing, but I don't understand how it could pass Jenkins before the fix? I have verified that the syntax is correct in the 2.2 tree, and that the test fails for me locally in the 2.1 tree. Which looks serious. Any ideas why 2.1 succeeded in Jenkins?

review: Needs Fixing

« Back to merge proposal