Merge lp:~seb128/update-notifier/wayland-no-pkexec into lp:update-notifier
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Brian Murray on 2017-09-06 |
| Approved revision: | 915 |
| Merged at revision: | 916 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~seb128/update-notifier/wayland-no-pkexec |
| Merge into: | lp:update-notifier |
| Diff against target: |
33 lines (+13/-2) 2 files modified
debian/changelog (+7/-0) src/crash.c (+6/-2) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~seb128/update-notifier/wayland-no-pkexec |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Murray | 2017-09-06 | Needs Information on 2017-09-06 | |
| Ubuntu Core Development Team | 2017-09-06 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
src/crash.c: don't prompt about system reports under wayland, pkexec
doesn't work there
Description of the Change
src/crash.c: don't prompt about system reports under wayland, pkexec
doesn't work there
- 915. By Sebastien Bacher on 2017-09-06
-
src/crash.c: don't prompt about system reports under wayland, pkexec
doesn't work there
| Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : | # |
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
> Is there no alternative to pkexec under wayland? How will system crashes be reported?
no, that's by design, we are going to improve apport to have it's interface being owned by the user and talking to a privileged backend (same as update-manager)
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
it's not ideal to not report the system crashes but the alternative is to give a password prompt that leads to an apport segfault which triggers another report
| Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : | # |
> > Is there no alternative to pkexec under wayland? How will system crashes be
> reported?
>
> no, that's by design, we are going to improve apport to have it's interface
> being owned by the user and talking to a privileged backend (same as update-
> manager)
When you say we here do you mean the desktop team or the foundations team? I haven't heard of this work.
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
> When you say we here do you mean the desktop team or the foundations team? I haven't heard of this work.
"we are going to improve" was meant to be "we are going to need to improve", indeed I don't think that work has been discussed yet but it's probably for foundations since that's the team which maintains it

Is there no alternative to pkexec under wayland? How will system crashes be reported?