Merge lp:~seb128/ubuntu-archive-tools/indicate-oem-tag into lp:ubuntu-archive-tools

[Sebastien Bacher]

indicate oem priority bugs in the sru report

Having the oem status reflected in the report is useful to make sure we give the proper priority to those items

[Brian Murray (brian-murray)]

This looks good from a code standpoint but I wonder who the target audience is here. Is the SRU team supposed to prioritize the release of oem SRUs or is it for people looking to verify SRUs?

review: Approve

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

The motivation for the change is to make easier for people doing the verifications to prioritize the most important items. I don't think the SRU team needs to have specific knowledge of teams priorities, also the report would be the wrong place because it's only built after the item is accepted.

=== modified file 'sru-report'
--- sru-report	2020-07-16 13:24:42 +0000
+++ sru-report	2021-02-19 11:47:17 +0000
@@ -457,9 +457,10 @@
                 cls += '"'
 
                 print('<a href="%s/bugs/%d" '
-                      'title="%s" %s>%d%s</a>' %
+                      'title="%s" %s>%d%s%s</a>' %
                       (lp_url, b, hover_text.replace('"', ''), cls, b,
-                       '(hw)' if 'hw-specific' in t else ''))
+                       '(hw)' if 'hw-specific' in t else '',
+                       '(oem)' if 'oem-priority' in t else ''))
             if failed_and_removable:
                 proposed_failed.append((releases[release].name, pkg,
                                        [str(b) for b in rpkg['bugs']]))