Merge lp:~seb128/ubiquity/new-gsd-binaries into lp:ubiquity
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre on 2017-07-25 |
| Approved revision: | 6540 |
| Merged at revision: | 6546 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~seb128/ubiquity/new-gsd-binaries |
| Merge into: | lp:ubiquity |
| Diff against target: |
49 lines (+19/-5) 2 files modified
bin/ubiquity-dm (+13/-5) debian/changelog (+6/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~seb128/ubiquity/new-gsd-binaries |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iain Lane | 2017-07-18 | Approve on 2017-07-27 | |
| Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre | 2017-07-18 | Approve on 2017-07-25 | |
| Didier Roche (community) | Approve on 2017-07-25 | ||
| Jeremy Bicha | 2017-07-18 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Update ubiquity-dm for the new gnome-settings-
Description of the Change
Update ubiquity-dm for the new gnome-settings-
The list of binaries is something that could be argued over, some are not very useful but could be used in some cases...
| Iain Lane (laney) wrote : | # |
Looks good, just one comment inline that you might or might not want to do. (I'm not a reviewer though).
| Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote : | # |
Looks fine to me. I added a comment on Laney's comment. I leave the decision for this particular thing to you.
- 6541. By Sebastien Bacher on 2017-07-27
-
check for the gsd directory rather than a specific binary
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
new commit up for review
- 6542. By Sebastien Bacher on 2017-07-27
-
Rebase on trunk
| Iain Lane (laney) wrote : | # |
I'm good with that, thanks.
Only concern is that if we move to multiarch paths there it'll stop working, but the full path to the binaries is given in any case, so that will already break.


LGTM, I think the list makes sense (at least, I wouldn't remove any binaries from it) without looking if more is needed.
Didn't spot anything bad python-side wide.