> we should not support the format 'release/esm-{infra/apps}', please follow the
> new CVE file format which is:
> PRODUCT/RELEASE
>
> so it should be:
> esm/precise [1]
> esm/trusty [1]
> esm-infra/xenial
> esm-apps/xenial
> esm-apps/bionic
> esm-apps/focal
> esm-apps/jammy
>
> [1] Please note that precise and trusty we do have alias setup to accept
> trusty/esm and precise/esm and this was a decision so we don't have to touch
> all our CVEs and infrastructure as their ESM came before the new CVE file
> format.
Thanks Eduardo!
I've made a new commit where I support the format release/esm{-infra/-apps}
In the end, it is a cleaner code.
If you could give a new look at it, I appreciate.
Thanks!
> we should not support the format 'release/ esm-{infra/ apps}', please follow the
> new CVE file format which is:
> PRODUCT/RELEASE
>
> so it should be:
> esm/precise [1]
> esm/trusty [1]
> esm-infra/xenial
> esm-apps/xenial
> esm-apps/bionic
> esm-apps/focal
> esm-apps/jammy
>
> [1] Please note that precise and trusty we do have alias setup to accept
> trusty/esm and precise/esm and this was a decision so we don't have to touch
> all our CVEs and infrastructure as their ESM came before the new CVE file
> format.
Thanks Eduardo!
I've made a new commit where I support the format release/ esm{-infra/ -apps}
In the end, it is a cleaner code.
If you could give a new look at it, I appreciate.
Thanks!