Merge lp:~roadmr/checkbox/plainbox-packaging-dbus-dependencies into lp:~checkbox-dev/checkbox/plainbox-packaging
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Zygmunt Krynicki |
Approved revision: | 13 |
Merged at revision: | 13 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~roadmr/checkbox/plainbox-packaging-dbus-dependencies |
Merge into: | lp:~checkbox-dev/checkbox/plainbox-packaging |
Diff against target: |
12 lines (+2/-0) 1 file modified
debian/control (+2/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~roadmr/checkbox/plainbox-packaging-dbus-dependencies |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Zygmunt Krynicki (community) | Approve | ||
Daniel Manrique (community) | Needs Resubmitting | ||
Review via email: mp+174519@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
Recent plainbox builds are failing, ostensibly because during testing, plainbox/
While it's strictly a Build-Depends, I also added it as a Depends since this will eventually be one of the main ways to use plainbox.
Let me know if it would be preferrable to remove the runtime dependency on dbus (not the build one), and instead add that dependency in i.e. GUI clients that communicate through dbus.
Description of the change
Recent plainbox builds are failing, ostensibly because during testing, plainbox/
While it's strictly speaking only needed as a Build-Depends, I also added it as a Depends since this will eventually be one of the main ways to use plainbox.
Let me know if it would be preferrable to remove the runtime dependency on dbus (not the build one), and instead add that dependency in i.e. GUI clients that communicate through dbus.
Thanks for looking at the packaging. I think I'd like to have plainbox-service as a standalone package, that ships the .service file and perhaps a small dedicated executable just for that. I'd rather not pull python3-dbus and the rest of dbus just for python3-plainbox.
Thanks