> Looks good. I must say the placement of the "Back to machine details"
> (http://people.canonical.com/~rvb/back_to.png) looks a bit odd to me: it seems
> a bit too close to node name and also that's not a pattern I recognize (have
> we used this anywhere else?).
Did you not see the update to this section? The back link has now moved and is far more readable. http://cl.ly/image/2B0i3R3y1c3d
> Looks good. I must say the placement of the "Back to machine details" people. canonical. com/~rvb/ back_to. png) looks a bit odd to me: it seems
> (http://
> a bit too close to node name and also that's not a pattern I recognize (have
> we used this anywhere else?).
Did you not see the update to this section? The back link has now moved and is far more readable. http:// cl.ly/image/ 2B0i3R3y1c3d