Code review comment for lp:~ricgard/maas/node-details-design-amednments

Revision history for this message
Richard McCartney (ricgard) wrote :

> Looks good. I must say the placement of the "Back to machine details"
> (http://people.canonical.com/~rvb/back_to.png) looks a bit odd to me: it seems
> a bit too close to node name and also that's not a pattern I recognize (have
> we used this anywhere else?).

Did you not see the update to this section? The back link has now moved and is far more readable. http://cl.ly/image/2B0i3R3y1c3d

« Back to merge proposal