Merge lp:~renatonlima/openerp-fiscal-rules/account_fiscal_position_rule_sale into lp:openerp-fiscal-rules
Proposed by
Renato Lima - http://www.akretion.com
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 59 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~renatonlima/openerp-fiscal-rules/account_fiscal_position_rule_sale |
Merge into: | lp:openerp-fiscal-rules |
Diff against target: |
204 lines (+69/-71) 4 files modified
account_fiscal_position_rule_sale/__init__.py (+0/-2) account_fiscal_position_rule_sale/__openerp__.py (+12/-14) account_fiscal_position_rule_sale/sale.py (+53/-54) account_fiscal_position_rule_sale/sale_view.xml (+4/-1) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~renatonlima/openerp-fiscal-rules/account_fiscal_position_rule_sale |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp | code review, no test | Approve | |
Review via email: mp+147676@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
- migrated Views
- Code formatting according to PEP-8
- Refactored stock.picking methods
To post a comment you must log in.
In __openerp__.py you can replace the entry points 'init_xml' and 'update_xml' by 'data'.
in __openerp__.py still, the comment:
## WHEN MERGING PLEASE LEAVE THE DEPENDENCY ON delivery BECAUSE OTHERWISE THE ONCHANGE_PARTNER_ID WILL BE TRIGGERED SOMETIMES IN DELIVERY
speak about a dependency on delivery but there is no such dependency. Comment to remove, or dependency to add?
l.81
Are you sure that the key 'context' will always be present in kwargs?
I think that you should default it to {} when the key is not found in kwargs.