Merge lp:~renatofilho/ubuntu/vivid/syncevolution/default-syncInterval into lp:ubuntu/vivid/syncevolution
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Ken VanDine on 2015-02-04 |
| Approved revision: | 31 |
| Merge reported by: | Ken VanDine |
| Merged at revision: | not available |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~renatofilho/ubuntu/vivid/syncevolution/default-syncInterval |
| Merge into: | lp:ubuntu/vivid/syncevolution |
| Diff against target: |
56 lines (+44/-0) 2 files modified
debian/patches/Use-90-days-as-default-value-for-syncInterval.patch (+43/-0) debian/patches/series (+1/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~renatofilho/ubuntu/vivid/syncevolution/default-syncInterval |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ken VanDine | 2015-02-04 | Approve on 2015-02-04 | |
| Iain Lane | Needs Information on 2015-02-04 | ||
| Sebastien Bacher | 2015-01-27 | Needs Information on 2015-01-30 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Added patch for syncInterval default value.
Use 90 days as default value for syncInterval. This value will be used by the phone, setting it as default will avoid changes on old configuration files.
> Thanks, could you provide some background on why that change is needed/wanted?
Added more context on commit message.
> Could you upstream the change as well?
No this will not get upstream this default value is specific for ubuntu devices.
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
Does that value makes sense on desktop as well?
| Iain Lane (laney) wrote : | # |
Is it appropriate to override the upstream default for all Ubuntu users like this?
I'd think that, if you want this for touch, the code interacting with syncevolution there should set the value appropriately.
| Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote : | # |
This does not appear to be reviewed nor approved yet. Something looks buggy, as this has landed in the archive already somehow. Reverting for now, awaiting review and sponsorship by authorised developers to make uploads for this package.
https:/
| Ken VanDine (ken-vandine) wrote : | # |
This patch really just changes a default for a value added by another patch of ours. That other patch has been accepted upstream recently, so at least in Ubuntu, the phone is the only real use case affected. This patch eases the migration on the phone, so worth patching. If we decide not to override upstream's default, we'll need to come up with a way to handle migrating the current settings.
I'm not clear why this default won't be accepted upstream, I'll ask Renato for clarification on that.
> This patch really just changes a default for a value added by another patch of
> ours. That other patch has been accepted upstream recently, so at least in
> Ubuntu, the phone is the only real use case affected. This patch eases the
> migration on the phone, so worth patching. If we decide not to override
> upstream's default, we'll need to come up with a way to handle migrating the
> current settings.
>
> I'm not clear why this default won't be accepted upstream, I'll ask Renato for
> clarification on that.
This default value is used only by ubuntu devices the upstream project does not want to limit the number of the days synced in the calendar. They want to keep import all as default behavior.
| Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote : | # |
The proposed change will affect all Ubuntu installations, including Ubuntu Desktop and all flavours. This change is not limited to ubuntu phone, as proposed. Is this a gsettings property that can be overriden to an appropriate value in the settings overlay for the Ubuntu Phone flavour-only, without affecting all other Ubuntu flavours that use syncevolution?


Thanks, could you provide some background on why that change is needed/wanted? Could you upstream the change as well?