> Renato,
>
> Can you please test that proposal of that NetworkListWorker creating its own
> instance of the parent item?
>
> There is a proposal https://code.launchpad.net/~carlos-mazieri/ubuntu-
> filemanager-app//fix-network-crash-1609051
>
> Also renamed "parent" to "parentItemInfo".
Thanks, Carlos will be a pleasure test that.
But as mentioned before if the parent get destroyed the operation will not be canceled and will be executed until the end. (In my opinion this is a wast of resources, but if you are ok with that)
Based on that information I do not think you need to check for (m_parentItemInfo != 0) in line 61. Since m_parentItemInfo will never be null.
> Renato, /code.launchpad .net/~carlos- mazieri/ ubuntu- app//fix- network- crash-1609051
>
> Can you please test that proposal of that NetworkListWorker creating its own
> instance of the parent item?
>
> There is a proposal https:/
> filemanager-
>
> Also renamed "parent" to "parentItemInfo".
Thanks, Carlos will be a pleasure test that.
But as mentioned before if the parent get destroyed the operation will not be canceled and will be executed until the end. (In my opinion this is a wast of resources, but if you are ok with that)
Based on that information I do not think you need to check for (m_parentItemInfo != 0) in line 61. Since m_parentItemInfo will never be null.