Code review comment for lp:~raof/mir/the-least-dirty-thing
Revision history for this message
| Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
67d34a1
(Get the code!)
Hah. I think we've found another area in which our stylistic preferences disagree :)
The way I see it, we currently hide the fact from our client API that Mir's coordinates system has exactly 32bits of significant data. “int” isn't hiding irrelevant implementation details, it's hiding a potentially relevant aspect of our API.
Indeed, I think we should be explicitly sizing *all* our types where they correspond to coordinates or other data types that are a part of our API that happen to be integral.