Merge ~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/samba:lp1858479-focal into ubuntu/+source/samba:ubuntu/focal-devel
Proposed by
Rafael David Tinoco
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | c3606a403272c7e036d808f5cc3b0d5d951cda80 |
Proposed branch: | ~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/samba:lp1858479-focal |
Merge into: | ubuntu/+source/samba:ubuntu/focal-devel |
Diff against target: |
130 lines (+55/-7) 3 files modified
debian/changelog (+19/-0) debian/control (+2/-2) debian/rules (+34/-5) |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Rafael David Tinoco (community) | Approve | ||
Steve Langasek (community) | Approve | ||
Canonical Server | Pending | ||
Canonical Server Core Reviewers | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+377241@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
Per @vorlon request:
BUG: https:/
PPA: https:/
To post a comment you must log in.
Steve,
I have 2 questions:
1) Would you like me to use the "-Nctdb" approach for the other packages mentioned in:
https:/ /people. canonical. com/~ubuntu- archive/ proposed- migration/ focal_uninst. txt
"libnss-winbind libpam-winbind python3-samba samba samba-common-bin samba-testsuite winbind"
?
2) How to solve the upstream-ability "Build-Depend" problem ?
I can't make a build-depend optional per Debian packaging guidelines, as it seems, so I would have to remove "libcephfs- dev"/"librados- dev" from Build-Depends entirely for i386. UNLESS I got this wrong, and you're keeping these packages around for build-purposes only.
Final doubt:
Should I request a merge in Salsa after I'm done ?
Cheers o/