I'm OK with this, but I wonder if it's worth folding the necessary AccessArtifact-related changes into this patch as well? See database/schema/archive/patch-2209-61-0.sql for an example from the last time we extended this sort of thing.
Adding William for a second DB review.
« Back to merge proposal
I'm OK with this, but I wonder if it's worth folding the necessary AccessArtifact- related changes into this patch as well? See database/ schema/ archive/ patch-2209- 61-0.sql for an example from the last time we extended this sort of thing.
Adding William for a second DB review.