Merge ~orion-cora/ubuntu/+source/sssd:xenial-sssd-hbac-rule-1722936 into ~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/sssd:ubuntu/xenial-devel
| Status: | Needs review |
|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | ~orion-cora/ubuntu/+source/sssd:xenial-sssd-hbac-rule-1722936 |
| Merge into: | ~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/sssd:ubuntu/xenial-devel |
| Diff against target: |
199 lines (+177/-0) 3 files modified
debian/changelog (+6/-0) debian/patches/hbac.patch (+170/-0) debian/patches/series (+1/-0) |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Hasenack (community) | 2017-11-27 | Needs Information on 2017-11-28 | |
| Canonical Server packageset reviewers | 2017-11-28 | Pending | |
| Ubuntu Server Dev import team | 2017-11-27 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Add upstream HBAC patch. Closes LP: #1722936.
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
- lint: OK
- source build: OK
- binary build: OK
- packaging: OK
Do you have a simple way that we can use to test this patch? Or do we need to setup AD and IPA?
| Orion-cora (orion-cora) wrote : | # |
I don't have a simple test. The issue we see with AD users trusted by IPA is that sometimes the supplemental group list is not correct. This then can lead to logins not being allowed due to HBAC rules not applying any more. I've been running with this patch applied on one system with no troubles for a month or so. It's highly recommended by upstream, they just have never released a 1.13.5 version with it. But this patch is from the 1.13 branch.
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | # |
I'll have to come up with a test plan for this change if we want to SRU it. I should be able to start work on that this week.
Unmerged commits
- 4241de7... by Orion-cora on 2017-11-27


Thanks! Could you please also add a review slot for "canonical-server"? Then it will show up in our queue more easily.