Merge lp:~numerigraphe/openobject-addons/5.0-unittest into lp:openobject-addons/5.0

[Numérigraphe]

Added a test file for bug #602188

[Numérigraphe (numerigraphe)]

Still no sign of a review, is adding an XML test off topic for v5.0?
Lionel.

Unmerged revisions

2432. By Numerigraphe - Lionel Sausin <email address hidden> on 2010-07-13

[ADD] test for bug 602188: wrong invoice number sequence for fiscal year in a certain case

=== modified file 'account/__terp__.py'
--- account/__terp__.py	2010-04-23 13:26:04 +0000
+++ account/__terp__.py	2010-07-13 09:01:01 +0000
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
         'demo/account_minimal.xml',
         'test/invoice_basic_test.xml',
         'test/invoice_bug452854_test.xml',
+        'test/sequence_bug602188_test.xml',
     ],
     'installable': True,
     'active': False,

=== added file 'account/test/sequence_bug602188_test.xml'
--- account/test/sequence_bug602188_test.xml	1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
+++ account/test/sequence_bug602188_test.xml	2010-07-13 09:01:01 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<openerp>
+    <data noupdate="1">
+        <!--
+            Make sure bug #602188 is fixed: Wrong invoice number sequence for
+            fiscal year in a certain case
+        -->
+        <!-- This file must be loaded  _after_  account_demo.xml ! -->
+
+        <!-- New invoice sequence for a fiscal year -->
+        <record id="seq_out_invoice_bug602188" model="ir.sequence">
+            <field eval="'Account Invoice Out for Fiscal Year '+time.strftime('%Y')"
+                name="name" />
+            <field name="code">account.invoice.out_invoice</field>
+            <field name="padding" eval="3" />
+            <field name="prefix">TEST-</field>
+            <field name="suffix">-bug602188</field>
+            <field name="number_next" eval="42" />
+            <field name="active" eval="True" />
+        </record>
+        <record id="seq_out_invoice_bug602188_fy" model="account.sequence.fiscalyear">
+            <field name="sequence_id" ref="seq_out_invoice_bug602188" />
+            <field name="sequence_main_id" ref="seq_out_invoice" />
+            <field name="fiscalyear_id" ref="data_fiscalyear" />
+        </record>
+
+        <!-- New invoice using the sequence -->
+        <record id="invoice_bug602188" model="account.invoice">
+            <field name="currency_id" ref="base.EUR" />
+            <field name="company_id" ref="base.main_company" />
+            <field name="address_invoice_id" ref="base.res_partner_address_tang" />
+            <field name="partner_id" ref="base.res_partner_asus" />
+            <field name="journal_id" ref="account.sales_journal" />
+            <field name="state">draft</field>
+            <field name="type">out_invoice</field>
+            <field name="account_id" ref="account.a_recv" />
+            <field name="name">lp:602188</field>
+            <field name="address_contact_id" ref="base.res_partner_address_tang" />
+            <field name="period_id" ref="period_1" />
+        </record>
+        <workflow action="invoice_open" model="account.invoice" ref="invoice_bug602188" />
+        <assert id="invoice_bug602188" model="account.invoice" severity="error"
+            string="Invoice lp:602188 got the right number">
+            <test expr="state">open</test>
+            <test expr="number">TEST-042-bug602188</test>
+        </assert>
+
+        <!-- Deactivate the sequence to not make other tests fail -->
+        <record id="seq_out_invoice_bug602188" model="ir.sequence">
+            <field name="active" eval="False" />
+        </record>
+    </data>
+</openerp>