Merge ~mthaddon/charm-k8s-content-cache/+git/charm-k8s-content-cache:end-user into charm-k8s-content-cache:master
Proposed by
Tom Haddon
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Tom Haddon |
Approved revision: | d77fe39fce88fed2af4caff5e8af9428dc1955db |
Merged at revision: | 24de1bd9dc1d30f98ede2490e7efd778221013f6 |
Proposed branch: | ~mthaddon/charm-k8s-content-cache/+git/charm-k8s-content-cache:end-user |
Merge into: | charm-k8s-content-cache:master |
Diff against target: |
120 lines (+52/-36) 2 files modified
README.md (+49/-33) metadata.yaml (+3/-3) |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Haw Loeung | +1 | Approve | |
James Troup (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email:
|
Commit message
Update README to be more end-user focused, and point to discourse-based docs for more information
Description of the change
Update README to be more end-user focused, and point to discourse-based docs for more information
To post a comment you must log in.
Couple of high level comments and then some inline.
1) I think there should be more prominence given to the fact that this cache is nginx powered? For better or worse, it's a globally recognised brand, we should trade on it.
2) the updated README leads with our use case. I think you should lead with an example use case, and use our story later as evidence of this charms cachet (sorry, pun not intended but gleefully used)