Merge lp:~mterry/unity8/unlock-via-dbus into lp:unity8
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Albert Astals Cid |
Approved revision: | 1208 |
Merged at revision: | 1224 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~mterry/unity8/unlock-via-dbus |
Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
Diff against target: |
121 lines (+19/-16) 6 files modified
plugins/LightDM/DBusGreeter.cpp (+5/-0) plugins/LightDM/DBusGreeter.h (+1/-0) plugins/LightDM/Greeter.h (+1/-0) qml/Shell.qml (+1/-1) tests/qmltests/tst_Shell.qml (+3/-2) tools/unlock-device (+8/-13) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~mterry/unity8/unlock-via-dbus |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
PS Jenkins bot (community) | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing | |
Albert Astals Cid (community) | Approve | ||
Martin Pitt | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+232428@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
With recent password support, we want to be able to unlock the device even with a password set. And we need to be able to do this once the new adbd lands. So I've added a DBus command to hide the greeter. This should be secure because all apps are constrained and if you're on the local session bus unconstrained, you already have access to anything you want.
Description of the change
With recent password support, we want to be able to unlock the device even with a password set. And we need to be able to do this once the new adbd lands. So I've added a DBus command to hide the greeter. This should be secure because all apps are constrained and if you're on the local session bus unconstrained, you already have access to anything you want.
== Checklist ==
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
- No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
- Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
- Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
- NA
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
- NA
Awesome, thanks! I have one diff comment to be future proof.