Merge lp:~mterry/unity8/narrow-mouse-hack into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Lukáš Tinkl on 2016-02-22 | ||||
| Approved revision: | 2175 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 2250 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~mterry/unity8/narrow-mouse-hack | ||||
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 | ||||
| Diff against target: |
94 lines (+26/-4) 4 files modified
qml/Greeter/CoverPage.qml (+13/-2) qml/Greeter/Infographics.qml (+2/-1) qml/Greeter/NarrowView.qml (+2/-1) tests/qmltests/Greeter/tst_NarrowView.qml (+9/-0) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~mterry/unity8/narrow-mouse-hack | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lukáš Tinkl (community) | 2016-02-02 | Approve on 2016-02-22 | |
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2016-02-17 | |
| Unity8 CI Bot | continuous-integration | Approve on 2016-02-17 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
To let the user log in if a mouse is connected, hide the greeter cover page on a mouse click (but NOT a touch click).
Description of the Change
This is just a short-term hack until design gives us a more mouse-friendly option for the greeter.
(While testing, I noticed that it was odd that the infographic didn't do anything when clicked if there was no data -- to the user, there is no feedback. So I turned off its double-click detector if there is no text.)
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
NA
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
NA
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2173
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote : | # |
Test?
- 2174. By Michael Terry on 2016-02-17
-
Merge from trunk
- 2175. By Michael Terry on 2016-02-17
-
Add test
| Michael Terry (mterry) wrote : | # |
Great point, test added.
| Unity8 CI Bot (unity8-ci-bot) wrote : | # |
PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:2175
https:/
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
SUCCESS: https:/
deb: https:/
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
https:/
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2175
http://
Executed test runs:
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
FAILURE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://
| Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde) wrote : | # |
Works great, tested on my N4
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Yes
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
Yes, modulo some AP woes
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes

FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:2173 /unity8- jenkins. ubuntu. com/job/ lp-unity8- 1-ci/258/
https:/
Executed test runs:
Click here to trigger a rebuild: /unity8- jenkins. ubuntu. com/job/ lp-unity8- 1-ci/258/ rebuild
https:/