Merge lp:~mterry/unity8/dont-refocus-dialer into lp:unity8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Michael Zanetti on 2015-01-21 |
| Approved revision: | 1562 |
| Merged at revision: | 1567 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~mterry/unity8/dont-refocus-dialer |
| Merge into: | lp:unity8 |
| Diff against target: |
12 lines (+1/-1) 1 file modified
qml/Shell.qml (+1/-1) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~mterry/unity8/dont-refocus-dialer |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS Jenkins bot | continuous-integration | Needs Fixing on 2015-01-21 | |
| Michael Zanetti (community) | Approve on 2015-01-21 | ||
| Gustavo Pichorim Boiko (community) | Approve on 2015-01-21 | ||
| Bill Filler (community) | 2015-01-21 | Approve on 2015-01-21 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Don't refocus the dialer-app when a call is started by the user. Because of how qtmir works, this would cause the dialer-app to unfocus momentarily, causing interface oddities for the user.
Description of the Change
Don't refocus the dialer-app when a call is started by the user. Because of how qtmir works, this would cause the dialer-app to unfocus momentarily, causing interface oddities for the user.
== Checklist ==
* Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.
No
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes, see bug for reproduction steps.
* Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes
* If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
NA
* If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
NA
| Gustavo Pichorim Boiko (boiko) wrote : | # |
Also tested it here, works fine and no regressions so far.
| Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote : | # |
* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Gustavo did.
* Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.
not yet, waiting for it still
* Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?
yes
| PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote : | # |
FAILED: Continuous integration, rev:1562
http://
Executed test runs:
UNSTABLE: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
SUCCESS: http://
UNSTABLE: http://
SUCCESS: http://
deb: http://
SUCCESS: http://
Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://

tested, fixes the issue and don't see any negative side effects or regressions.