Merge lp:~mhall119/ubuntu/precise/geany/add_keywords into lp:ubuntu/precise/geany
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Merged at revision: | 32 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~mhall119/ubuntu/precise/geany/add_keywords |
| Merge into: | lp:ubuntu/precise/geany |
| Diff against target: |
39 lines (+19/-0) 3 files modified
debian/changelog (+6/-0) debian/patches/add_keywords.patch (+12/-0) debian/patches/series (+1/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~mhall119/ubuntu/precise/geany/add_keywords |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Pitt | 2012-02-27 | Approve on 2012-03-19 | |
| Didier Roche | Needs Information on 2012-02-29 | ||
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Adds searchable keywords to Geany's .desktop file
| Didier Roche (didrocks) wrote : | # |
btw, repeating the same information I did on other merge requests:
thanks for your contribution to ubuntu and for this merge requests :)
Some notes about it:
- we normally comment the changes in the debian/changelog file. For that, we are using debchange -i and write something like:
- move the .desktop file change into something the patch system of the package can deal with
http://
| Michael Hall (mhall119) wrote : | # |
Upstream has both a bug report and a git pull request.
https:/
https:/
| Didier Roche (didrocks) wrote : | # |
Can you link it to the bug report please? (and fix the other notes)
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | # |
Thank you for your work
Setting to "Work in progress" please set back to "Needs review" when you update so it shows again on the sponsoring list
Didn't we agree to not patch universe softwares this cycle?
Your patch upstream needs to be updated as well:
- to use the current spec format
- the most recent patch on https:/
- you need to prefix Name with a _, i.e "_Name=" to be translatable
- 33. By Michael Hall on 2012-03-05
-
Add details to patch file, add LP bug # to changelog
| Michael Hall (mhall119) wrote : | # |
We agreed not to patch Quicklists, because their strings were exposed to the user, and a lack of translation would be noticeable. Keywords are not displayed, only used in searches, so a lack of translation wouldn't have any effect.
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | # |
Seems fine to me, thanks! Will merge with the changelog typo fixed (LP bug ref) and fixing the patch headers for DEP-3.


Hey Michael, did you sent the fix upstream? I normally do that for external contributor but I think we should show the lead there (if you did so, you should state it either in the merge req or link the upstream bug tracker in the bug report)