Merge lp:~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-recompress-png-resources into lp:compiz/0.9.8
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Daniel van Vugt on 2012-07-30 |
| Approved revision: | 3295 |
| Merged at revision: | 3297 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-recompress-png-resources |
| Merge into: | lp:compiz/0.9.8 |
| Diff against target: |
54 lines (+0/-0) 0 files modified
|
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-recompress-png-resources |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel van Vugt | Approve on 2012-07-30 | ||
| Sam Spilsbury | 2012-07-28 | Approve on 2012-07-30 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Reduces combined filesizes of Compiz' .png resources from 2.2MB to 1.5MB by recompression of those with Trimage Image Compressor.
This will decrease package size, downloading/
png files with higher compression take less time to display, not only because of reduced loading times, but also because deflation in memory finishes faster as decompression speed is largely uninfluenced by the compression level and thus decompression of better compressed png files is faster.
Description of the Change
Reduces combined filesizes of Compiz' .png resources from 2.2MB to 1.5MB by recompression of those with Trimage Image Compressor.
This will decrease package size, downloading/
png files with higher compression take less time to display, not only because of reduced loading times, but also because deflation in memory finishes faster as decompression speed is largely uninfluenced by the compression level and thus decompression of better compressed png files is faster.
References:
According to http://
Also the authors suggest to use an optimizer to better compress your .png files (9.4 Practical compression tips - 9.4.1. Tips for Users - http://
Here you can see that quite modern hardware also decompresses crushed/optimized files faster:
http://
Here another recommendation to use png optimization:
http://
| Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote : | # |
Yep, they all look the same. Higher compression is a good idea.


Should be fine, we don't use these images in the default usecase anyways