Code review comment for lp:~mbp/bzr/417881-selftest-no-apport

Revision history for this message
Martin Pool (mbp) wrote :

On 3 February 2010 17:18, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> So I realise this has landed already, but I think its the wrong
> approach ;)
>
> Specifically, we should IMO disable apport *anyway* for development
> trees - where there is a .bzr dir. That way, for selftest:
>  - as packaged, we get apport bug reports about selftest (good)
>  - as a dev environment, we don't get apport in our way (good)

It's easy to change. Where do you think we should specify that
something is a development environment?

I don't think "not from a package" or "running from home" is perfect
because there are users who regularly run that way. But perhaps it is
the best tradeoff.

Alternatively we can set "debug_flags = no_apport" ourselves and
simply reverse this patch.

--
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>

« Back to merge proposal