Code review comment for lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1
Revision history for this message
| Rikkert Frederix (frederix) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
67d34a1
(Get the code!)
Hi Marco,
I agree that the current way is wrong, but has no effect on the running of the code whatsoever. Even though, we should replace ch_i and ch_j in the call to the Qterms.
Note that, if there was 'true' bug here, the soft and/or collinear checks and the beginning of any run would not have passed.
Cheers,
Rik