Code review comment for lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1

Rikkert Frederix (frederix) wrote :

Hi Marco,

I agree that the current way is wrong, but has no effect on the running of the code whatsoever. Even though, we should replace ch_i and ch_j in the call to the Qterms.
Note that, if there was 'true' bug here, the soft and/or collinear checks and the beginning of any run would not have passed.

Cheers,
Rik

« Back to merge proposal