Hi all,
I have just noticed this (fks_singular, line 3818)
call Qterms_reduced_timelike(j_type,i_type,ch_i,ch_j,t,z,Q)
it should be instead
call Qterms_reduced_timelike(j_type,i_type,ch_j,ch_i,t,z,Q)
(switch ch_i <--> ch_j), shouldn't it?
It may be that in the end there is no effect, since, for the relevant cases when either ch_i or ch_j ==0 and the other is not one has always Q=0
Hi all, reduced_ timelike( j_type, i_type, ch_i,ch_ j,t,z,Q) reduced_ timelike( j_type, i_type, ch_j,ch_ i,t,z,Q)
I have just noticed this (fks_singular, line 3818)
call Qterms_
it should be instead
call Qterms_
(switch ch_i <--> ch_j), shouldn't it?
It may be that in the end there is no effect, since, for the relevant cases when either ch_i or ch_j ==0 and the other is not one has always Q=0
c g/a ->qqbar splitting
Qterms(1) = 4d0 * TR * z*(1d0-z)**2
Qterms(2) = 4d0 * dble(abs(col1)) * ch1**2 * z*(1d0-z)**2
elseif ((abs(col1).eq.3 .and. col2.eq.8) .or.
& (dabs(ch1).gt.0d0 .and. dabs(ch2).eq.0d0)) then
c q->q g/a splitting
Qterms(1) = 0d0
Qterms(2) = 0d0
Let me know
Cheers,
Marco