Merge lp:~loic.molinari/oxide/oxide-ubuntu-scale-factor into lp:~oxide-developers/oxide/oxide.trunk
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Merged at revision: | 1364 |
| Proposed branch: | lp:~loic.molinari/oxide/oxide-ubuntu-scale-factor |
| Merge into: | lp:~oxide-developers/oxide/oxide.trunk |
| Diff against target: |
122 lines (+41/-21) 3 files modified
qt/core/browser/oxide_qt_screen_client.cc (+15/-0) qt/core/browser/oxide_qt_screen_client.h (+3/-0) qt/core/browser/oxide_qt_screen_utils.cc (+23/-21) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~loic.molinari/oxide/oxide-ubuntu-scale-factor |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Coulson | 2016-02-15 | Approve on 2016-02-29 | |
| Gerry Boland (community) | Needs Fixing on 2016-02-19 | ||
| Michał Sawicz (community) | Needs Information on 2016-02-17 | ||
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit Message
Added support for scale factor retrieved from the Ubuntu QPA plugin.
Description of the Change
Added support for scale factor retrieved from the Ubuntu QPA plugin.
| Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote : | # |
No, please don't do that. All changes land on trunk first
| Michał Sawicz (saviq) wrote : | # |
@Chris yeah, but we'd need this change for demo, and taking the whole of trunk oxide with us just for that feels suicidal...
| Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote : | # |
But that doesn't change anything - all changes are developed against and land on trunk first
| Gerry Boland (gerboland) wrote : | # |
+ SIGNAL(
+ SLOT(OnScreenPr
Should be QPlatformScreen
| Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote : | # |
One other thing - does the QPA plugin do the actual scaling in this case, or is this still done in the UI toolkit?
| Gerry Boland (gerboland) wrote : | # |
> One other thing - does the QPA plugin do the actual scaling in this case, or
> is this still done in the UI toolkit?
UITK does scaling, as should anything that renders content. QPA doesn't do any scaling.

Loic, this is against an oxide that's not even close to getting in to ubuntu... we're still at 1.12.5.
Any chance this could be reapplied against that?