cedd18e...
by
Charlie Marsh <email address hidden>
Remove some unused `pub` functions (#3872)
## Summary
I wrote a bad Python script to find these.
1fc6a59...
by
Charlie Marsh <email address hidden>
Remove special-casing for editable requirements (#3869)
## Summary
There are a few behavior changes in here:
- We now enforce `--require-hashes` for editables, like pip. So if you
use `--require-hashes` with an editable requirement, we'll reject it. I
could change this if it seems off.
- We now treat source tree requirements, editable or not (e.g., both `-e
./black` and `./black`) as if `--refresh` is always enabled. This
doesn't mean that we _always_ rebuild them; but if you pass
`--reinstall`, then yes, we always rebuild them. I think this is an
improvement and is close to how editables work today.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
It removes the unused result when creating the Cache with the
`from_path` constructor. I don't believe it does any io operations any
more at least.
Add workspace support when using `-r <path>/pyproject.toml` or `-e
<path>` in the pip interface. It is limited to all-editable
static-metadata workspaces, and tests only include a single main
workspace, ignoring path dependencies in another workspace. This can be
considered the MVP for workspace support: You can create a workspace,
you can install from it, but some options and conveniences are still
missing. I'll file follow-up tickets (support in lockfiles, support path
deps in other workspace, #3625)
There is also support in `uv run`, but we need https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3700 first to properly support
using different current projects in the bluejay interface, currently the
resolution and therefore the lockfile depends on the current project.
I'd do this change first (it's big enough already), then #3700, and then
add workspace support properly to bluejay.
Fixes #3404
89cfece...
by
Charlie Marsh <email address hidden>
Add support for `prepare_metadata_for_build_editable` hook (#3870)
