Merge lp:~kubernetes/charms/trusty/etcd/trunk into lp:charms/trusty/etcd
Proposed by
Charles Butler
on 2015-08-18
| Status: | Merged | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merged at revision: | 17 | ||||||||
| Proposed branch: | lp:~kubernetes/charms/trusty/etcd/trunk | ||||||||
| Merge into: | lp:charms/trusty/etcd | ||||||||
| Diff against target: |
73 lines (+18/-5) 4 files modified
README.md (+7/-1) hooks/hooks.py (+8/-1) templates/etcd.conf.jinja2 (+1/-1) tests/10-deploy (+2/-2) |
||||||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~kubernetes/charms/trusty/etcd/trunk | ||||||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Bruzek (community) | 2015-08-18 | Approve on 2015-09-22 | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
Updates init template to include a local host binding
To post a comment you must log in.
| Charles Butler (lazypower) wrote : | # |
lp:~kubernetes/charms/trusty/etcd/trunk
updated
on 2015-09-22
- 19. By Matt Bruzek on 2015-09-22
-
The run method is on the unit object not sentry.

This appears to have pulled in a prior merge that hasn't quite landed,
Not sure what happened as that MP is not listed as active against the charmers branch of the charm. Please address this MP as required, noting that the included fix was to correct an issue where leader election is not available in older releases of Juju, and this adds behavior to correctly notify the user that leader election is not available.