many: include prompt prefix in apparmor rules (#13822)
* features,i/{apparmor,builtin}: include prompt prefix in home interface
If prompting is supported and enabled, include the prompt prefix in
AppArmor rules for the home interface, which will cause AppArmor to send
a prompt when accessing any file in $HOME.
In the future, if other interfaces include the ###PROMPT### prefix in
their rule snippets, this will also be handled accordingly.
At the moment, the status of prompting support is checked whenever the
AppArmor backend prepares profiles. This is okay, since AppArmor support
for prompting depends on kernel and parser features, which are only
probed once after snapd starts. However, to ensure that the same
supported value is used even if that were not the case, and in case we
wish to only use the prompt prefix for some snaps or interfaces, we may
wish to embed whether to use the prompt prefix in the AppArmor
Specification instead.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* features: adjust unsupported messages when checking apparmor features errors
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* interfaces: add prompting status to system key
Include whether prompting is supported and enabled as a single field in
the system key. This way, if `(supported && enabled)` changes, security
profiles will be regenerated when snapd starts up.
Currently, prompting support only changes when the AppArmor kernel or
parser features change, and profile regeneration is the only other place
where it is checked whether AppArmor prompting is supported and enabled.
Thus, including whether prompting is supported and enabled in the system
key ensures that security profiles are regenerated when necessary during
snapd startup, and only when necessary (e.g. not if support changed but
prompting flag remained disabled nor if flag changed but prompting
remained unsupported).
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* o/c/configcore: restart snapd when prompting value changes
When the prompting flag changes and the result entails that security
profiles should be regenerated, restart snapd to do so.
This is required iff prompting is supported and the experimental
apparmor-prompting flag changes -- if prompting is not supported,
prompting can't be used, so no need to regenerate profiles. Importantly,
prompting support is based entirely on the available AppArmor kernel and
parser features, and these are only probed once during snapd startup, so
prompting support cannot change (under the current implementation)
except when snapd restarts.
Since `(supported && enabled)` is part of the system key, and a restart
is only triggered if prompting is supported and the flag value changes
(which is equivalent to `(supported && enabled)`, since the supported
value cannot change while snapd is running), restarting after the flag
has changed causes the system key to be different, and thus to trigger a
security profile regeneration, as desired.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* interfaces,o/ifacestate: set prompting in apparmor spec
Rather than checking whether AppArmor prompting is supported and enabled
whenever the AppArmor backend is processing a snippet, instead include
that precomputed value in the Specification itself, and place it there
via `buildConfinementOptions`. This way, any spec created with the same
`confinementOptions` will make the same decision as to whether to
include prompt prefixes on relevant rules.
Currently, `buildConfinementOptions` simply checks whether prompting is
supported and enabled via the methods on `features.AppArmorPrompting`,
but ideally, this value would be looked up from either the system key
or by checking whether the prompting listener is running. It remains to
be seen how the value computed as part of the system key can be
guaranteed to be the same as that used elsewhere, either in
`buildConfinementOptions` or when deciding whether to start the
listener.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* o/c/configcore: request snapd restart whenever prompting flag changes
Previously, a snapd restart was only requested when the status of the
"apparmor-prompting" experimental feature flag changed and prompting was
supported. However, since prompting support is dependent on AppArmor
kernel and parser features which are probed only once during startup,
and systems which do not use vendored AppArmor may have had an update to
the system AppArmor package which newly supports AppArmor prompting, it
is safer to request a restart of snapd to re-check for prompting
support.
This way, if one is enabling prompting for the first time on a system
without prompting support, they can have snapd installed, update their
kernel or apparmor installation to support prompting, and then set the
prompting flag to enable prompting without needing to manually restart
snapd.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* interfaces: support optional trailing space after ###PROMPT###
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
i/apparmor: move promptReplacer definition to before its use
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: add test of restart behavior when setting experimental.apparmor-prompting
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: refactor prompting test to reset failed count and safely check for restarts
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
tests: add shellcheck exception for apparmor prompting flag restart test
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: check that snapd PID != 0 and use snap changes to wait for feature change to complete
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: check for start-limit-hit before calling reset-failed
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: add ubuntu core to apparmor prompting flag restart test
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: check apparmor-prompting value after setting it unchanged
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* Revert "tests: check for start-limit-hit before calling reset-failed"
This reverts commit bea68516c3287fa44d6718f0794484746ae99ac5.
* tests: check systemd start-limit-hit when apparmor-prompting flag changed
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* o/configstate/configcore: add unit tests for doExperimentalApparmorPromptingDaemonRestart
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* i/builtin: add missing prompt prefix and adjust test
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* i/apparmor: add test for prompt prefix substitution
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* many: pass prompting value into system key functions
As such, we now precompute whether prompting is supported and enabled in
`InterfaceManager.StartUp()`, store it in the `InterfaceManager`
instance, and pass it into the call to `WriteSystemKey()`.
Additionally, we make `buildConfinementOptions` a method of
`InterfaceManager`, thus eliminating the need to check within the system
key functions whether prompting is supported and enabled.
However, there remains a problem that `snap run` calls
`SystemKeyMismatch()`, which previously invoked
`apparmor.ParserFeatures()` via `AppArmorPrompting.IsSupported()`, and
now calls `AppArmorPrompting.IsSupported()` directly and passes the
result into `SystemKeyMismatch()`. In either case, we really want this
to be avoided if at all possible, since `snap run` does not have access
to the cached value from the `InterfaceManager`, and thus must invoke
the `apparmor_parser` binary to check parser features whenever we want
to run any snap.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* many: don't probe parser features when checking system key mismatch
Since `snap run` calls `SystemKeyMismatch()`, we want to avoid needing
to call `AppArmorPrompting.IsSupported()` if at all possible, since this
calls `apparmor.ParserFeatures()`, which executes the `apparmor_parser`
binary. We can and should call `AppArmorPrompting.IsSupported()` when
writing the system key, but not when checking for a mismatch.
The system key written to disk should correctly hold the list of kernel
and parser features, the parser mtime, and whether or not prompting was
previously supported and enabled. We can check whether apparmor parser
features have changed by checking the parser mtime, without needing to
probe parser features -- this optimization is already used by
`SystemKeyMismatch()`. If we knew whether prompting was previously
supported (regardless of whether it was enabled), then so long as the
parser and kernel features are unchanged, we know that prompting support
is also unchanged.
Thus, if we add a second prompting-related field to the system key, this
one storing whether prompting is supported (ignoring enabled), we can
check if prompting support is unchanged without needing to call
`AppArmorPrompting.IsSupported()`.
Furthermore, `SystemKeyMismatch()` is the function in question, and if
there is any mismatch detected, it should return such as soon as
possible, regardless of what the mismatch is. Therefore, if we know that
either kernel or parser features have changed, then we can immediately
return that there is a mismatch, and we don't need to check whether
those feature changes affect prompting support.
Therefore, the new cases which we must worry about when checking for a
system key mismatch are the following, when all other system key fields
are unchanged (note that prompting must be supported in order to be
supported&&enabled):
1. supported: F, supported&&enabled: F, newFlag: F, mismatch: F
2. supported: F, supported&&enabled: F, newFlag: T, mismatch: F
3. supported: T, supported&&enabled: F, newFlag: F, mismatch: F
4. supported: T, supported&&enabled: F, newFlag: T, mismatch: T
5. supported: T, supported&&enabled: T, newFlag: F, mismatch: T
6. supported: T, supported&&enabled: T, newFlag: T, mismatch: F
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* interfaces: fix test string formatting
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* o/configstate/configcore: adjust prompting-related comments
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: increase prompting check_snapd_restarted timeout and add systemd show
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: reset start limit when checking if snapd restarted after prompting change
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* many: add system key extra data to hold prompting enabled status
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* many: only store one apparmor prompting value in system key
When checking for a system key mismatch, use the stored AppArmor
parser features from the system key on disk (along with the kernel
features from the newly-generated key) to check whether prompting is
supported, and AND that with the `AppArmorPrompting` value passed in
with the `SystemKeyExtraData`. If the kernel or parser features have
changed, the system key will be a mismatch anyway, so it is perfectly
safe to use the existing parser features to check for prompting support.
As such, the functions to check for prompting support have been moved
from `features` to `sandbox/apparmor`, and the support check has been
separated from the call to get `ParserFeatures()` and
`KernelFeatures()`, so that the values from the system key can be passed
in instead of invoking those functions.
Using the system key's stored parser and kernel features, there is no
need to save whether prompting is supported as part of the system key,
simplifying the key and the logic used to set the prompting value.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: explicitly install jq in apparmor-prompting-flag-restart test
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* many: consolidate checks for apparmor prompting support
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* interfaces,s/apparmor: use features struct when checking prompting support
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: improve logging in apparmor-prompting-flag-restart test
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
* tests: fix prompting flag restart test on core18
For some reason, when snapd fails due to start-limit-hit on core18, the
snapd.failure.service starts and acquires the state lock, thus
preventing snapd from successfully becoming "active" again and leaving
it retrying at "activating". It is unclear why this happens on core18
and not elsewhere.
As a fix, when resetting the start limit, stop snapd.failure.service
manually to ensure that snapd can successfully start.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Calder <email address hidden>
